Legal Aptitude & Logical Reasoning | CRACKER is a focused and up-to-date study resource designed for the CS-Executive Entrance Test (CSEET) – Paper 2. It meticulously follows the latest CSEET syllabus, covering the Legal Aptitude and Logical Reasoning components. The book equips aspirants with ample practice questions, memory-based previous exam questions, and a rapid revision tool, offering a wholesome exam preparation experience.
The Present Publication is the 4th Edition for the July/Nov. 2025 & Jan. 2026 Exams. This book is authored by CA. (Dr) K.M. Bansal, Adv. Ritika Godhwani and Praveen Baldua, with the following noteworthy features:
The coverage of the book is as follows:
The structure of the book is as follows:
                        Please Follow Lawmart Shipping & Delivery Policy - https://www.lawmart.in/shipping_delivery.php
Please Follow Lawmart Return & Cancellation Policy - https://www.lawmart.in/return_cancellation.php                    
Understand how to apply given legal principles to factual situations. This section doesn't test legal knowledge but your ability to reason logically using legal concepts.
Contracts: Offer, acceptance, consideration, breach
Torts: Negligence, nuisance, defamation
Criminal Law: Theft, murder, assault, general defenses
Constitutional Law: Fundamental rights, directive principles
Legal Maxims: Latin phrases and their meanings
Awareness of legal developments, major judgments, and constitutional amendments.
Important Supreme Court judgments (e.g., Kesavananda Bharati, Maneka Gandhi)
Recent laws and amendments (e.g., CAA, data protection bill)
Legal personalities and positions (e.g., Attorney General, CJI)
Landmark historical events (e.g., Emergency 1975, formation of Constitution)
Includes static legal facts:
Parts and schedules of the Constitution
Articles of the Constitution
Sources of law: legislation, precedent, custom
International organizations (e.g., UN, ICJ, WTO)
Indian Judiciary system structure
These are critical for CLAT and LSAT–India, where questions are passage-based:
Identifying the principle
Applying it to the given facts
Identifying contradictions or logical flaws
Drawing conclusions from legal texts
Principle: A person is liable for negligence if they owed a duty of care, breached it, and caused damage.
Fact: A doctor failed to diagnose a patient correctly, leading to complications.
Question: Is the doctor liable?
Assertion: The Constitution provides the right to freedom of speech.
Reason: It allows people to defame others without restrictions.
Options:
(A) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
(B) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
(C) A is true but R is false.
(D) A is false but R is true.
Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea – An act does not make one guilty unless there is a guilty mind
Salus populi suprema lex – Welfare of the people shall be the supreme law
Ignorantia juris non excusat – Ignorance of the law is no excuse
Legal Aptitude for the CLAT and other Law Entrance Examinations – A.P. Bhardwaj
Universal's Guide to CLAT & LLB – LexisNexis
Pearson Legal Aptitude – for CLAT, AILET, SLAT
| CA Dr. K.M. Bansal , Adv. Ritika Godhwani, Praveen Baldua Legal Aptitude & Logical Reasoning | 
Ready to Wear Clothing
    
        Color: Gray
1 X $113.88
We were affected by the fire next door and will remain closed until further notice.
Close