Product Details Page

D. N. Mathur's Interpretation of Statutes

From Central Law Publications
0.0 Stars

Author :D. N. Mathur

Publisher :Central Law Publications

ISBN No :978-9390735181

SKU :CLP356

Edition :6th edition, 2022

Pages :480

Format :Paperback

HSN No :49011010

Regular price 430.00 387.00 |Save: 43.00(10 %)
Tax included
In stock Pre-order Now
Please enter area Pincode Then Add to cart/ Buy it now
powerby cards
SPENT 499 MORE FOR FREE SHIPPING
Expected Delivery Within 7 Working Days.
powerby cards

Description

Interpretation is a skilful technique to deduce the intention of Legislature from the language of the statutes. This classic work provides coherent and comprehensive overview of Interpretation of Statues. The present edition incorporates recent landmark judgments of Supreme Court of India and various High Courts. In addition, a new chapter titled “Rawls Theory of Justice” has been inserted explaining the principles of procedural and social justice. The book features a “chapter summary” at the end of each chapter to facilitate a cursory look at the material contained in it. Though basically designed for students of law, the present work shall also be useful to teachers, practicing lawyers and all others operating in legal field.

Size Guide

Shipping & Return

Please Follow Lawmart Shipping & Delivery Policy - https://www.lawmart.in/shipping_delivery.php

Please Follow Lawmart Return & Cancellation Policy - https://www.lawmart.in/return_cancellation.php

Content

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

WHAT IS LAW

ESSENTIAL INGREDIENTS OF LAW

NATURE, OBJECT AND FUNCTION OF LAW

SOURCES OF LAW

KINDS OF LAW

Imperative law

Physical Law or Law of Nature or Scientific Law

Natural Law or Moral Law

Conventional Law

Customary Law

Practical or Technical Law

International Law

Civil Law

Common Law

Statute Law

Law of equity

Constitutional Law

Administrative Law

Special Laws

THREE ORGANS OF GOVERNMENT

LEGISLATION

PROCESS OF LEGISLATION

ENACTED LAW OR STATUTE LAW

SUPREME AND SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION

MORALS AND LAW

         Relationship between Morals and Law Morals are the basis of Law

(a)          Morals are the test of Law

(b)          Morals are the end of Law

(c)          Morals are the part of Law

Distinction between Morals and Law

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER II

RAWLS’ THEORY OF JUSTICE

MEANING OF THE TERM “JUSTICE”

PROCEDURAL JUSTICE

Perfect procedural justice

Imperfect procedural justice

Pure procedural justice

Quasi-pure procedural justice

Perfect procedural justice and imperfect procedural justice distinguished

LEGITIMACY

Obeying the law and civil disobedience

SOCIAL JUSTICE

PRINCIPLES OF SOCIAL JUSTICE

First principle—The principle of liberty

Second principle—The principle of distribution of opportunities and resources

Both the principles must be complied together

Principles apply directly to basic social structure

Principles do not directly apply to the components of basic social structure

Sequence of four stages

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER III

THE MEANING, OBJECT AND NECESSITY OF

INTERPRETATION

MEANING OF INTERPRETATION

INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION

OBJECT AND PURPOSE OF INTERPRETATION

MEANING OF AMBIGUITY

        Latent ambiguity

        Patent ambiguity

NECESSITY TO INTERPRET A PROVISION

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER IV

INTERPRETATION IS THE ART OF FINDING

THE TRUE LEGISLATIVE INTENT

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTERV

CERTAIN PRESUMPTIONS AND

CONSIDERATIONS IN INTERPRETATION

MEANING OF PRESUMPTION

MEANING OF CONSIDERATION

DISTINCTION BETWEEN PRESUMPTION AND CONSIDERATION

PRESUMPTIONS IN INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES

(i)          Presumption as to validity of the statute

        Doctrine of Pith and Substance

        Colourable legislation

        Repugnancy between Central and State Law

(ii)        Presumption as to territorial operation of the statute

        Theory of territorial nexus

(iii)      Presumption that statutes are consistent with International Law

(iv)      Presumption that Legislature does not commit mistake

(v)        Presumption that Legislature does not use superfluous words

(vi)      Presumption that words used by Legislature bear ordinary meaning

(vii)    Presumption that Legislature has knowledge of English grammar

(viii)  Presumption that Legislature knows law and judicial decisions

        Precedent

        Stare decisis

(ix)      Presumption as to re-enactment

(x)        Presumption that vested rights are preserved

(xi)      Presumption that Legislature does not intend what is inconvenient

(xii)      Presumption that Legislature does not intend any alteration in existing law except what it expressly declares

(xiii)     Presumption against retrospectivity

(xiv)    Presumption as to jurisdiction of courts

CONSIDERATIONS IN INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES

(i)           Consideration of Absurdity

(ii)          Consideration of Futility

(iii)        Consideration of Reasonableness

(iv)        Consideration of Injustice

(v)         Consideration of Hardship

(vi)        Consideration of Inconvenience

(vii)      Consideration of Anomaly

(viii)     Consideration of Consequences

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER VI

THE PROCESS OF INTERPRETATION

GRAMMATICAL OR LITERAL INTERPRETATION

LIMITATIONS OF GRAMMATICAL OR LITERAL

        INTERPRETATION

(i)           Ambiguity

(ii)         Inconsistency

(iii)        Deficiency in the Act itself

LOGICAL INTERPRETATION

GRAMMATICAL/LITERAL AND LOGICAL INTERPRETATION

COMPARED

GRAMMATICAL/LITERAL INTERPRETATION TO BE PREFERRED

DISCOVERY OF LEGISLATIVE INTENT IS THE ULTIMATE GOAL

AN OVERVIEW OF SOME RULES OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION

(a)         Statute to be interpreted in tune with its object

(b)         Statute should be construed in a manner to carry out

legislative intent

(c)          Statute cannot be given retrospective effect

(d)         Court cannot add, delete or substitute words or supply to deficiencies of the statute

(e)          No provision should be interpreted in isolation

(f)          Interpretation by which statute is turned to nullity should be discarded

(g)       If the language of a statute is clear, it must be enforced

(h)       Intention of Legislature is to be primarily gathered from the words used

(i)        Plain, ordinary and natural meaning to be assigned to the words

(j)       Meaning of a word depends on the context in which it is used

(k)     Same words same meaning

(l)       Words be given that meaning which they bore at the time of enactment

(m)   Construction of general words

(n)     Golden Rule

(o)     Mischief Rule

(p)     Harmonious Construction

(q)     Strict and liberal construction

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER VII

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION

(i)          INTENTION OF LEGISLATURE

(ii)        EX VISCERIBUS ACTUS

(iii)       Application of the Principle of ex visceribus actus

(iv)      UT RES MAGIS VALE AT QUAM PEREAT

Application of the Principle of ut res magis valeat quam pereat

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER VIII

OTHER RULES OF INTERPRETATION

(i)     RULE OF PLAIN AND ORDINARY MEANING

Application of the Rule of Plain and Ordinary Meaning

Departure from the rule of plain and ordinary meaning (When different meaning may be adopted)

(ii) LANGUAGE SHOULD BE READ AS IT IS

(a)    Avoiding addition or substitution of any word

         Application of the Rule

         Departure from Rule (When Addition of Words is Permissible)

(b)    Avoiding rejection of words

   Application of the Rule

   Departure from the Rule (Treating the Words as Superfluous and their Rejection is Permissible)

(c)    Casus Omissus

Application of the Rule

Departure from the Rule (When omitted Words can be Supplied)

(iii)   LEGAL FICTION OR DEEMING PROVISION

        Interpretation of Provisions creating Legal Fiction

(iv)   NON OBSTANTE CLAUSE

(v)    MANDATORY AND DIRECTORY PROVISIONS

Mandatory Provisions

Directory Provisions

Distinction between Mandatory and Directory Provisions

Use of “shall” and “may” is not Decisive Factor

Statutes Providing Consequences are Mandatory in Nature

Use of Negative Words generally renders the Provision Mandatory

Negative word is not sole criteria to declare a provision Mandatory

(vi)   CONJUNCTIVE AND DISJUNCTIVE WORDS

(vii)  SAME WORD TO BEAR SAME MEANING UNLESS

OTHERWISE INTENDED

(viii) DIFFERENT WORDS ARE NOT USED IN SAME SENSE

(ix)  RULE OF LAST ANTECEDENT

(x)   RULES OF CONSTRUCTION OF GENERAL WORDS

(a)   Noscitur A Sociis

 Application of the Rule of Noscitur a Sociis

(b)   Ejusdem Generis

Conditions for Application of Ejusdem Generis

Application of the Rule of Ejusdem Generis

Cases where the Court refused to apply the Rule of Ejusdem Generis

(c)   Words of rank

(d)   Reddendo Singula Singulis

 Application of the Rule of Reddendo Singula Singulis

(xi)  THINGS TO BE DONE AND POWER TO BE EXERCISED

 IN THE SAME MANNER AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER IX

KINDS OF CONSTRUCTION

(i)           LITERAL CONSTRUCTION

What is Natural and Ordinary Meaning

Justification of applying Natural and Ordinary Meaning

Application of the Rule of Natural and Ordinary Meaning

Technical Words to be understood in technical sense only

Application of the Rule of Technical Words in Technical Sense

Legal Sense of the Words

Abandonment of Literal Construction

Hardship or inconvenience is no ground to abandon literal construction

(ii)          CONTEXTUAL INTERPRETATION

(iii)        GOLDEN RULE

(iv)        HEYDON’S CASE : HEYDON’S RULE : MISCHIEF RULE :

        PURPOSIVE CONSTRUCTION

Applicability of Mischief Rule

Application of Mischief Rule

(v)         HARMONIOUS CONSTRUCTION

Principles of Harmonious Construction

Generalia specialibus non derogant

Generalibus specialia derogant

Application of the Rule of Harmonious Construction

(vi)        RULE OF READING DOWN

(vii)      STRICT AND LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION

(viii)     STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF TAXING OR FISCAL STATUTES

Principles of strict construction of taxing or fiscal statutes

Words not to be stretched against a tax-payer

Ambiguous words to be construed in favour of tax-payer

Hardships or equitable considerations to be ignored

Application of strict construction to taxing or fiscal statutes

Evasion of statutes

(ix)        STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF PENAL STATUTES

Principles of strict construction of penal statutes

Courts cannot strain the words on any notion

Construction favourable to the accused must be preferred

Purpose of the statute must be kept in view

Mischief rule can be applied

Common-sense approach may be taken, if necessary

Application of language to developments in science and technology permitted

Application of strict construction of penal statutes

(x)        LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION OF REMEDIAL STATUTES

        Principles of Liberal or beneficent construction

        Liberal construction can be applied only when there is clear ambiguity

        That interpretation should be preferred by which benefit is extended

        Benefits cannot be allowed in contravention of statutory provision

        Application of Liberal or beneficent construction of remedial statutes

        Distinction between remedial and penal statutes

        CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER X

AIDS TO CONSTRUCTION

MEANING OF “AIDS TO CONSTRUCTION’

WHEN AIDS TO CONSTRUCTION CAN BE LEGITIMATELY INVOKED

KINDS OF AIDS TO CONSTRUCTION

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER XI

INTERNAL AIDS TO CONSTRUCTION

(i)    TITLE

        Short Title

        Long Title

        Use of Title for Resolving an Ambiguity

        Limitations of Title as Internal Aid to Construction

(ii)   PREAMBLE

        Limitations of Preamble as Internal Aid to Construction

(iii)  DEFINITION OR INTERPRETATION CLAUSE

        Kinds of definitions

        Restrictive or Exhaustive definition

        Inclusive or Extensive definition

        Exception to the general rule that “Means is exhaustive” and Includes is Extensive” 

        Effect of Use of Words “Means and Includes” on Scope of Definition

        Effect of Use of Words “Deemed to Include” on Scope of Definition

        Effect of Use of Words “Includes” and “Shall Not Include” on Scope of Definition

        Use of Definition for Resolving Ambiguity

(iv) HEADINGS

        Limitations of Headings as Internal Aid to Construction

(v)   MARGINAL NOTES

        Use of Marginal Notes for Resolving Ambiguity

        Limitations of Marginal Notes as Internal Aid to Construction

(vi) PUNCTUATION MARKS

        Use of Punctuation Marks for Resolving Ambiguity

        Limitations of Punctuation Marks as Internal Aid to Construction

(vii) ILLUSTRATION

        Use of Illustrations for Resolving Ambiguity

        Limitations of Illustration as Internal Aid to Construction

(viii) PROVISO

        Real Nature and Function of Proviso

        Use of Proviso for Resolving Ambiguity

        Limitations of Proviso as Internal Aid to Construction

(ix) EXPLANATION

        Limitations of Explanation as Internal Aid to Construction

(x)   SCHEDULES

        CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER XII

EXTERNAL AIDS TO CONSTRUCTION

(i) PARLIAMENTARY HISTORY

English Practice

        (a) Traditional view

        (b) Criticism of traditional view

        (c) Modern view

        (d) Objections on modern view

Indian Practice

What comprises Parliamentary History

(a)   Debates on a Bill in the process of its passing

        Use of Debates on a Bill for Resolving Ambiguity

        Limitations of Debates on a Bill as External Aid to Construction

(b)   Statement of Objects and Reasons accompanying a Legislative Bill

        Use of Statement of Objects and Reasons for Resolving Ambiguity

        Limitations of Statement of Objects and Reasons as External Aid to Construction

(c)   Reports of Commission, Inquiry Committee, Joint

        Parliamentary Committee or Study Group

Use of Reports of Commission, Inquiry Committee, Joint

        Parliamentary Committee or Study Group for Resolving Ambiguity

Cases in Which Reports of Commission, Inquiry Committee,  Joint Parliamentary Committee or Study Group Were Not Admitted

(ii)   HISTORICAL FACTS AND SURROUNDING

        CIRCUMSTANCES

        Limitations of Historical Facts and Surrounding

        Circumstances as External Aid to Construction

(iii)  SUBSEQUENT SOCIAL, POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC

        DEVELOPMENTS AND SCIENTIFIC INVENTIONS

(iv)  DICTIONARIES

        Use of Dictionaries for Resolving Ambiguity

        Limitation of Dictionaries as External Aid to Construction

(v)   TEXT BOOKS

(vi)  STATUTES IN PARI MATERIA

        When two Statutes are not in Pari Materia

        Use of Statutes in Pari Materia for Resolving Ambiguity

        Merits of the Rule of Reference to Statutes in Pari Materia

(vii) HELP FROM EARLIER STATUTES

        Use of Earlier Statutes for Resolving Ambiguity

        Amending Acts

(viii) HELP FROM SUBSEQUENT LEGISLATION

(ix)  INCORPORATION OF EARLIER ACT INTO LATER

        Effect of Incorporation

(x)   CODIFYING STATUTES

        Features of Codifying Statues

        Construction of codifying statutes

(xi)  CONSOLIDATING STATUTES

        Features of consolidating statutes

        Construction of consolidating statutes

        Distinction between Codifying and Consolidating Statutes

(xii) CONTEMPORANEA EXPOSITIO

        Application of Contemporanea Expositio

(xiii) FOREIGN DECISIONS OR FOREIGN JUDGMENTS

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER XIII

TEMPORARY AND PERPETUAL STATUTES :

THEIR EXPIRY AND REPEAL

COMMENCEMENT OF STATUTE

KINDS OF STATUTES ON THE BASIS OF LIFE

TEMPORARY STATUTES

Expiry of temporary statutes

Effect of expiry of temporary statutes

PERPETUAL STATUTES

Repeal-of perpetual statute

Kinds of repeal

Express repeal

Essentials of express repeal

Implied repeal

Presumption against implied repeal

Test of implied repeal

General principles of implied repeal

Effect and consequences of repeal

Amending Act and its Effects on Principal Statute

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER XIV

PROSPECTIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE

OPERATION OF STATUTES

MEANING OF OPERATION OF STATUTE

PROSPECTIVE OPERATION

RETROSPECTIVE OPERATION

LEGISLATURE IS COMPETENT TO MAKE RETROSPECTIVE LAW

PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROSPECTIVITY

OPERATION OF VARIOUS KINDS OF STATUTES

        (a)   Statutes dealing with substantive rights are presumed to be prospective

        (b)   Statutes dealing with procedure are presumed to be retrospective

        (c)   Statutes governing succession are not retrospectively operated

        (d)   Statutes regulating transfers and contracts are not retrospectively operated

        (e)   Statutes prescribing limitation are prospective but may have retrospective operation for

               certain matters

        (f)   Fiscal Statutes are prospective in respect of charging provisions but are retrospective in

               respect of the provisions dealing with procedure

        (g)   Penal Statutes creating new offences or increasing penalty for existing offences are

               prospective only

        (h)   Statutes prescribing future disqualification on past misconduct are not retrospective

        (i)    Remedial statutes are not necessarily retrospective

        (j)    Statutes dealing with appeals are prospective only

        (k)   Pending proceedings : alterations in procedure can be applied but alterations affecting

               substantive right cannot be applied

ALTERATION OF SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS

ALTERATION IN MATTERS OF PROCEDURE

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER XV

DELEGATED AND CONDITIONAL LEGISLATION

MEANING OF LEGISLATION OR ENACTMENT

DOCTRINE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS

Law making power is vested in the Legislature

SUPREME AND SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION

DELEGATED LEGISLATION

REASONS FOR GROWTH OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION

CONTROL OVER DELEGATED LEGISLATION

Need to control the delegated legislation

Exercising control over delegated legislation

Parliamentary control over delegated legislation

Judicial control over delegated legislation

VALIDITY OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION

LIMITATIONS OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION

PRESENT STATUS OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION

POWER OF DELEGATION IS NOT ABSOLUTE

WHAT CAN BE DELEGATED

WHAT CANNOT BE DELEGATED

EXCESSIVE DELEGATION

CONDITIONAL LEGISLATION

DISTINCTION BETWEEN DELEGATED AND CONDITIONAL LEGISLATION

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER XVI

INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES AFFECTING

JURISDICTION OF COURTS

MEANING OF JURISDICTION

WHAT IS “EXCLUSION OF JURISDICTION” OR “OUSTER OF JURISDICTION”

EXCLUSION OF JURISDICTION NOT TO BE READILY INFERRED

PRINCIPLES RELATING TO EXCLUSION OF JURISDICTION

APPLICATION OF THE RULE OF EXCLUSION OF JURISDICTION

EXTENT OF EXCLUSION

CHAPTER SUMMARY

CHAPTER XVII

CERTAIN LEGAL MAXIMS

Apactis privatorum publico juri non derogatur

A verbis legis non est recedendum

Ab abusu ad usum not valet consequentia

Ab inconvenienti

Ab initio

Absoluta sententia expositore non indiget

Abundans cautela non nocet

Accessorium non ducit, sedsequitur suum principale

Actio personalis moritur cum persona

Actus curiae neminem gravabit

Actus dei neminem gravabit

Actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea

Ad proximum antecedens fiat relation nisi impediatur sentential

Ambiguum pactum contra venditorem interpretandum est

Amicus curiae

Argumenturn a simili valet in lege

Argumentum ab auctoritate est fortissimum in lege

Argumenturn ab impossibili plurinum valet in lege

Argumentum ab inconvenienti plurinum valet in lege

Audi alteram partem

Boni judicis est jus dicere, non jus dare

Casus Omissus

Cogitationis pae mam nemo meretur

Consenus facit lagem

Contemporanea exposito est optima et fortissimo in lege

Contra legam facit, quid facit quod lexprohibet in fraudem vero qui salvis verbis legis sententiam ejus circum venit

Conventio vincit lagem

Copulatio verborum indicat acceptationem in eodem sensu

Crimina morte extinguuntur

Cui  jurisdictio data est, ea quoque concessa esse videntur, sine quibus jurisdictio explicari non potuit

Cuilibet licet renuntiar juri prose introducto

Damnum sine injuria

De novo

Delegatus non potest delegare

Ejusdem Generis

Ex abusu non arqumentum ad desuetudinem

Ex antecedentibus et consequentibus fit optima interpretation

Ex majori cautela

Ex parte

Ex suo motu

Ex visceribus actus

Exempla illustrant, non-restringunt lagem

Executio juris non habet injuriam

Expressum facit cessare taciturn

Expressio unius est exclusio alterius

Fictio juris

Fictio legis neminem laedit nemini operatur damnum vel injuriam

Fractionem died non recipit lex

Generalia specialibus non derogant

Generalibus Specialia derogant

Generalia verba sunt generalita intelligenda

Hoc quidem perquam durum es sed ita lex scripta est

Ignorantia facti excusat; Ignorantia juris non excusat

In camera

In civile est nisi tota lege perspecta una aliqua particular ejus proposita judicare vel respondere

In fictione juris simper existit aeqtuitas

In pari delicto potior est conditio possidentis

In personam

In re

In rem

Inclusio unius exclusio alterius

Index animi sermo

Injuria sine damnum

Interest republicae ut sit finis litium

Leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant

Lex non cogit and impossibilia

Nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa

Non exemplis, sed-legibus indicandum est

Non obligat lex nisi promulgate

Non obstante

Noscitur A Sociis

Nova constitutis futuris formam imponere debet, non praeteritis

Obiter dictum

Pari material

Per incuriam

Quando aliquid prohibetur, prohibetur et omne perquod devinetur ad illud 

Ratihabitio priori mandato aequiparatur

Ratio decidendi

Reddendo Singula Singulis

Res sub judice

Res judicata

Res judicata pro veritate occipitur

Roy n’est lie per ascun statute, si il ne soit expressment nosme

Stare decisis et non quieta movere

Sub silentio

Ubi jus ibi remedium

Ut res magis valeat qauam pereat

More Information

Product Summary

D. N. Mathur's Interpretation of Statutes By Central Law Publications

Review

Please Login to Submit Review.

Customer questions & answers

Please Login to Post Your Question

Post Your Question

Recently Viewed Products

3000.00 2700.00
Add To Cart
19800.00 18810.00
Add To Cart
499.00 249.00
Add To Cart

Size Guide

Ready to Wear Clothing

Added to your shopping cart successfully.

Added to your shopping cart successfully.
Cushioned Office Chair

Color: Gray

1 X $113.88

Total: $113.88